Odd-even formula: Consider disabled commuters, says HC

New Delhi, Dec 23 (IANS) Refusing to stay plying of vehicles in the national capital with odd-even formula, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the state government to take into consideration the issues of physically challenged commuters while formulating the scheme – and said it would hear the matte on January 6, 2016.

The court also took note of Delhi government’s submission that the “scheme has not been finalised yet”. The scheme, which is to be notified on December 25, will run January 1-15, 2016 on a trial basis.

A division bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said: “The Delhi government shall take into consideration the concerns of various sections of society, including physically challenged people, while making the scheme on odd-even numbers issue.

“What precautions you (Delhi government) have taken so that they don’t have to face any problems? You should take into consideration their concerns,” the court remarked.

The court was hearing a bunch of public interest litigations challenging the Aam Aadmi Party government’s decision early this month to only allow even and odd numbered vehicles to ply in Delhi on alternative dates from January 1 for 15 days.

The court noted that one of the petitioners was a physically challenged person.

The odd-even formula will not apply to auto-taxis, public transport and emergency vehicles like ambulances.

One of the petitioners, Nipun Malhotra, pleaded for allowing the physically challenged commuters to use their own vehicles since public transport was not disabled friendly.

The court earlier refused to restrain the AAP government from enforcing its odd-even formula, saying the decision is on a “trial basis”.

The PILs filed earlier said the government announced its plan to restrict the number of cars on roads without first conducting a public debate and a study of the pros and cons of a system based on whether the registration number of a motor vehicle ends in an even or odd digit.

The petitioners said the decision was taken without considering the disturbing effect it would have on the public at large.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of www.mangalorean.com or any employee thereof. www.mangalorean.com is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of www.mangalorean.com to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at  info@mangalorean.com. Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here