Adani’s Australia coal mine project faces fresh legal challenge

Melbourne, Nov 9 (IANS) The coal mine project to be built by India’s Adani group in Australia’s Queensland state, faced a fresh legal challenge on Monday from an environmental group seeking cancellation of the government approval.

The group contended that the project would damage the ecologically sensitive Great Barrier Reef and cited that as the reason for seeking its cancellation.

Last month, the Australian federal government gave a fresh approval for Adani’s 16 billion Australian dollars (US $12 billion) Carmichael coal mine project in remote central Queensland.

Challenging the government approval, the Australian Conservation Foundation said Environment Minister Gregv Hunt failed to consider whether the impact of climate pollution, resulting from burning the mine’s coal, would be inconsistent with Australia’s international obligations to protect the World Heritage-listed Great Barrier Reef.

“The Great Barrier Reef is loved by Australians and overseas visitors, but it will soon be gone if we allow climate change to keep accelerating,” ACF President Geoff Cousins said.

“Coral reef scientists are telling us in just a few decades warmer waters could bleach the Reef beyond recognition. This would be a tragedy for Australia and the world,” he added.

“The minister has acknowledged climate change is affecting the Great Barrier Reef, yet the approval of the Carmichael mine will create more pollution, make global warming worse and irreversibly damage the Reef,” Cousins said.

“Taking legitimate legal action in the public interest is central to keeping governments accountable in a democracy,” he added.

Commenting on the development, the Adani Group in a statement said: “Today’s (Monday) announcement by the ACF is the latest in a litany of attempts by politically-motivated activists seeking to endlessly delay new, job creating projects in Queensland.”

“Adani has consistently said what is required for major job creating resource projects to proceed in this state and in Australia more broadly is regulatory and approvals’ certainty,” it noted.

“It is one thing for a project’s approval to be challenged. It is quite another to wait for previous challenges to fail, then launch new ones on different grounds over, and over again, seeking endless delay, and endlessly abusing process,” the statement added.

First proposed in 2010, the Carmichael project will dig up and transport about 60 million tonnes of coal a year for export, mostly to India.

The mine will cover an area seven times the size of Sydney Harbour. It includes a railway project and was first approved by the government last year.

The opposition from Green groups got significant traction when Federal Energy Minister Josh Frydenberg commented recently that there is “a strong moral case” for mining and exporting coal to poor countries like India.

“Most importantly of all, it will help lift hundreds of millions of people out of energy poverty, not just in India but right across the world,” he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s Insiders programme on free-to-air television. “I think there is a strong moral case here.”

The Australian minister while presenting a case said that Adani’s coal mine would create “thousands of jobs” in Queensland as it would mean an investment of 16 billion Australian dollars flowing into the regional communities.

1 Comment

  1. Before touching any project in the Western countries that has any kind of environmental impact one has to think very carefully. Modi-G’s sponsor, Adani through government contacts, has borrowed s**t-load of money from SBI to invest in this dubious project. Now my question is will Modi-G pay from his pocket if this project tanks or SBI loses the money and the burden is put on the Indian tax payer? The collateral could be worthless by then (just see how the Mallya’s collateral turned out in the end).

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of or any employee thereof. is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here