Sign-In:  
New Member: ronald pinto, India | Join Now! |

Apr 23, 2014

Could We Send God On A Long Leave?

Print this article  
By Dr. B. M. Hegde, India [ Published Date: May 20, 2006 ]

Dr. B. M. Hegde MD, FRCP, FRCPE, FRCPG, FRCPI, FACC, FAMS, is presently the Chairman of State Health Society, Govt. of Bihar, India, Visiting Prof. Cardiology at The Middlesex Hospital Medical School - University of London, Affiliate Prof. of Human Health - Northern Colorado University, Visiting Prof. Indian Institute of Advanced Studies - Shimla,  Retd.  Vice Chancellor, MAHE University - Manipal. Prof Hedge regularly gives talks on AIR, Doordarshan, BBC and Zee TV, London. 

A few years ago when Ian Wilmot, at the Rosalind Institute in Edinburgh, produced the first cloned sheep, "Dolly", by electrically fusing one of the mother's mammary cells with another body cell, sparing the need for a father, he and many others of his ilk felt that they could send God packing back to his abode in heaven, since man did not need him any more. People started worrying about the prospect of cloning humans with base instincts like Hitler and were afraid that human cloning would be disastrous, to say the least. Many Governments and Church leaders asked for ban on human cloning experiments. Man, proud man, having created God in his own image, with his limited knowledge of the working of this Universe, predicted that the day is not far when he would be able to cure all ills of mankind with genetically engineered quick fixes for every disease and also predicted that he would be able to keep man alive here for ever!

Scientists also claimed that they are at the threshold of unraveling the mystery of the human genome, which they thought would have anywhere between 100.000 to 150,000 genes in each chromosome. Writing a scientific article in the Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, I had seen the writing on the wall. In the reductionist science predicting the future with limited knowledge of the initial state of the organism is an impossibility. "Doctors have been predicting the unpredictable," wrote Professor Firth of the Starthclyde University in Glasgow, years ago in the British Medical Journal, 1991 Xmas issue. Being a physicist he knew what he was talking about.

In my article in the physician's journal, which was later published in the book Progress in Medicine, I had postulated that it would be impossible to clone another man from his genes alone. We could certainly clone and produce a genetic "look-alike", but never another man like the one whom we were trying to clone in the first place. This reasoning was based on the premise that man is made up of three parts basically, his phenotype that is based on his genes, his genes, and his consciousness (mind) that evolves basically with the environment that the zygote (product of the fusion between the father's sperm and mother's ovum) lives in from the time of its getting embedded in the mother's womb to the time that it ends up in the tomb!

Even the time of delivery, the second stage of labour, if delayed, could change the prospect of later onset of certain disease traits like asthma! There is no way we could clone another Mahatma Gandhi or Hitler unless we could make the cloned first cell to go through the same environment that both of them went through from the time of conception to the time they did what they did for society, an impossibility even in the best of scientific laboratories.

Any thinking scientist would have been wiser by the events of last one month. The much-hyped genome is now ready with only 30,000 to 45,000 genes or so; much less than what was predicted (predicting the unpredictable). In addition it has become very clear to the scientists, if not to the companies funding this research and wanting to patent them as soon as possible to make money, that there is not likely to be a single gene in total charge of any disease.  Just as there is no single pill for every ill, there can not be a simple one gene for every human trait!

How true that Sage Kapila way back around the seventh century BC had clearly written down in his treatise on illnesses that for all the three major classes of human diseases, dhukhathriyas-aadhyathmika, adhiboutika, and adidaivika dukhas, there could be a fault in either the bhijaha (chromosome) or bhijabaaghaha (gene); but the penetrance of the fault depends on the assistance of the environment where the seed is sown. How I wish we had heeded his suggestions! Now it must be clear even to an elementary school child that it is near nigh impossible to clone a complete human being unless we could know his phenotype (form), his genotype (genome), and also his consciousness (mind).

Positive sciences are just about getting an introduction to the human mind. Till now even physicists thought the answer to the million-dollar question: "where is the mind?"  is simply, "never mind". Now with the advances in quantum physics mind has been defined to a certain extent, although not fully. Interestingly, the ancient Ayurvedic concept of the mind comes very close to the concept in physics. Simply put mind can not be considered as an organ-based idea like the liver or the heart. Mind also is not confined to the brain. The brain has about a billion cells. If the mind were to be like the liver one would not even be able to understand a grain of salt, since the latter has more than ten billion atoms. Mind, therefore, is a sub-atomic quantum concept present in every human cell.  Most physicists now agree with Schrodinger that everything is, possibly, in the eye of the beholder!

Study after study recently has shown the singularly significant role played by the human mind in the causation of any disease, with special reference to killer diseases like heart attack, cancer, and stroke. Of the multitude of risk factors, negative thought stood out as the most important risk for the above maladies in men and women. In short, it is what eats one that seems to kill him rather than what he eats. Now we have to come to our senses, after having lived in a make believe world in reductionist science, that time evolution in any dynamic system depends not on one or two initial characteristics of the organism. Far from it. Very far indeed!  Time evolution depends on the total initial state of the organism that includes the knowledge of the genes, the form (phenotype) and, above all, the mind (consciousness). That is exactly what sage Kapila wrote nearly three thousand years ago.

The genome, that has come to fore lately, would help mankind to a certain extent in understanding the mysteries of human ills and their solutions, but will never solve the problem in toto. It could, however, add to man's misery, though. If a child's genome were to have the heart attack related genes, there is a possibility that the child could get a heart attack in later life only if the other two parts of the child-body and mind-were to abet the genes.  The hapless child, its parents, the insurance company that might be asked to insure this child, the future in-laws and employers, however, would be in trouble. They would always be anxious about the risk that the child runs. For the poor child the anxiety could be killing. Mankind already has so much of anxiety, partly due to the present concept of civilization. That could be compounded by the awareness of the gene map. In reality, therefore, gene mapping could make life hell for some, in addition to the ethical dilemma for the medical and allied professions about the confidentiality. I wonder how we would be able to solve the problem of giving evidence in a court of law when called upon to do so regarding the gene map, while, at the same time, keeping individual genetic knowledge a secret.

The initial euphoria regarding the gene map is settling down to anxiety. The greed of the drug companies, which have been proved to run medical education in the USA from the time the medical student enters the portals of a medical school till the time he is buried in the grave (The Lancet 2000, December 5th issue), are the ones that give the false hype to the whole game. Like any other new discovery in the field of reductionist science we should take this news about the genes also with a pinch of salt. However, this new development has a positive side to it as well. Scientists are slowly realizing the need for non-linear mathematics and holistic science in unraveling the mysteries of the human being. There is no pill for every ill. Chance governs our very existence on this planet. Science could try to keep us healthy and happy as long as we live. Sexual reproduction is still our best bet to have a wide gene base for the offspring to be healthy and happy. Most genetic engineered species would be vulnerable even to the slightest change in their environment!

Genes came, our dreams, however, have remained unrealized in reality after all!  Needless to say that time is still not ripe for God to go on long leave.

 Comment on this article
Name: Country:
E-mail:
Comments:
Security code: Security code   Reload Image
Enter code:   (shown above)
There are no comments posted on this article.
More articles by Dr. B. M. Hegde, India
 

 
 
Privacy  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Tell your Friend  |  Contact Us  |  Join Us  |  Home    
Site designed and maintained by Mangalore Media Company