China’s wildlife protection law draft amendment sparks debate

Beijing, Jan 5 (IANS) China’s first proposed amendment to its wildlife protection law in 26 years has triggered heated debate among animal rights activists, the media reported on Tuesday.

Some animal rights activists called for the deletion of the phrase “developing and utilising wildlife resources” from the draft to prevent wildlife from being used for commercial purposes, though they approve of its great significance to the protection of wild animals, the Global Times reported.

The draft amendment, which was submitted for first reading at the bi-monthly session of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee on December 26, 2015, adds regulations on punishments for selling, purchasing, utilising and transporting wild animals that are not nationally protected. The amendment also bans people from performing mercy releases of captive animals.

Under the draft’s stipulations, citizens are obligated to protect wildlife and are expected to report any encroachment on or damage to wildlife habitats. The draft also requires local governments to protect wildlife and habitats with specific measures.

However, many animal rights activists and experts said that they hoped the term “utilising wild animals” would be deleted from the draft.

“The draft law still views wild animals as resources, which goes against the worldwide trend,” Mang Ping, a professor of environmental ethics at the Central Institute of Socialism, said, adding that such terms should be deleted to prevent wild animals from being used for commercial purposes.

Yu Fengqin, director of wildlife protection NGO Ark in Green Fields, also suggested that people who buy and eat wild animals should face punishment.

Yu said that all wild animals should be protected by the law, not just species that are rare or near extinction, or species which have an important economic or scientific value.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of or any employee thereof. is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here