Modi raises Tier-2 visa issue with Cameron

Washington, April 2 (IANS) Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised the issue of change in Tier-2 visa rules with his British counterpart David Cameron during a bilateral meeting here on the sidelines of the Fourth Nuclear Security Summit.

“Prime minister also raised the issue of Tier-2 visas for ICT companies,” external affairs ministry spokesman Vikas Swarup said at a media briefing following the meeting on Friday.

“He said that skilled professionals should not find it difficult to come to work in the UK,” Swarup informed the media.

Under a new rule, skilled professionals holding Tier-2 visas face deportation from Britain after five years if they cannot prove annual earnings of 35,000 pounds (nearly $50,000).

Earlier, a Tier-2 visa holder could apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) in Britain with a annual income of around 21,000 pounds.

The new rule comes into effect on April 6 and is likely to affect thousands of Indian skilled professionals.

In this context, Modi told Cameron that the recommendations made by the migration advisory committee could cast a negative light and a solution needed to be found.

“Prime Minister Cameron promised to take a look at it,” Swarup said.

“He said that we don’t want to disadvantage bonafide IT companies but at the same time, we would also hope to ensure that the UK system is not misused.”

During the meeting, Modi also informed Cameron that high-tech defence production in India has been opened to 100 percent foreign direct investment (FDI) and that British companies could take advantage of this.

The two leaders also discussed cooperation in the fight against terrorism.

Tata steel crisis: Cameron defends blocking tariffs

Washington, April 2 (IANS) British Prime Minister David Cameron defended the Britain’s decision to reject higher EU tariffs on Chinese steel as the business secretary faced the anger of Port Talbot workers whose livelihoods have been undermined by cut-price imports.

Cameron, on a visit to Washington, said on Friday that the Britain was right to block plans that he argued would “rewrite not simply the tariff rules on steel, but the entire tariff infrastructure of the EU”.

The Labour accused the government of failing to protect British workers from China’s “highly aggressive approach in this economic battle”.

On Friday morning, China raised tensions by imposing a 46 percent import duty on a type of steel made by Tata in Wales.

Hours earlier, Downing Street sources said that Cameron had confronted Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington to express his concerns on Thursday night.

Business secretary Sajid Javid returned from an official trip to Australia to face a tense scene in Port Talbot, south Wales, where thousands of steelworkers face losing their jobs.

Arriving three days after the crisis first broke, Javid said that it was the government’s interventions that had stopped Tata from closing down the Port Talbot site overnight, and urged the Indian giant to get on with selling the business. He left to shouts of “save our steel, save our steel” from workers.

Earlier, speaking to hundreds of Port Talbot workers outside talks with trade union officials and Tata management, Javid said that he expected there to be formal expressions of interest once the sale process officially launched and described steel as “absolutely vital to the future of British industrial sector”. One Port Talbot worker also handed Javid a “Save Our Steel” badge.

Javid said that the most pressing concern was for Tata to set out an offer “and to make sure that all potential buyers have all the relevant information they would need. You would naturally expect them to want that early on… so they can complete that due diligence as quickly as possible,” he said.

He reiterated that nationalising the Port Talbot steelworks was “not a viable long-term solution” but said he would “work with potential buyers and listen to how we can help”.

But sources who met with the business secretary at Port Talbot told the Guardian that he had failed to set out any potential steps that the government could take, claiming that “commercial” sensitivities prevented him releasing any details.

Gareth Stace, director of UK Steel, said it was time for ministers to “think the unthinkable” and consider imposing “the nuclear option” of temporarily blocking the flood of imports from entering Britain.

Stace also called on ministers to ignore any state aid rules set by the EU and deal with the consequences in the aftermath.

He warned that Britain’s steel industry now risked being cut by two-thirds and argued that it was “unlikely” that Tata Steel would secure a buyer without urgent action from the government, including changing the EU rules urgently.

Javid joined Cameron in defending Britain’s behaviour within the EU, as it emerged that the business secretary had told members of parliament weeks ago that it was right for British business to have access to cheap Chinese imports.

Javid was criticised for travelling to the other side of the world, taking his daughter with him, when he knew that the Tata decision was pending.

He claimed that he had been unaware that the plans for closure could carry a timetable of “weeks” rather than months.

He insisted that the government was helping with a 400 million pounds package of compensation on energy costs for the industry, and work on tackling unfair trading practices in the EU.

But the steel company Celsa has confirmed that as of Friday it still has not received a penny of the energy costs compensation agreed after months of wrangling in December 2015.

Javid admitted that finding a buyer for Tata’s loss-making assets would not be straightforward and said he recognised that any potential buyer may require the help of the British government.

Meanwhile Cameron raised the issue of the future of the Port Talbot plant with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on the sidelines of the security summit in Washington.

A source said: “Modi said that the Indian steel industry was facing similar challenges from global over-capacity and the Chinese economic slowdown.”

Modi arrives in Saudi Arabia

Riyadh, April 2 (IANS) Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived here on Saturday from Washington on a two-day bilateral visit to Saudi Arabia on the third and final leg of his three-nation tour.

This is the first prime ministerial visit to the oil-rich Gulf kingdom since the visit of then prime minister Manmohan Singh in 2010.

Modi was received at the King Khalid International Airport by Governor of Riyadh Prince Faisal Bin Bandar Al Saud.

“Salaam Riyadh. PM @narendramodi arrives in Saudi Arabia to a ceremonial welcome, received by the Governor of Riyadh,” external affairs ministry spokesman Vikas Swarup tweeted.

Modi is scheduled to meet with representatives of the nearly three million-strong expatriate Indian community later on Saturday.

He will be accorded a ceremonial welcome on Sunday afternoon at the Royal Court here by Saudi King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud.

King Salman will also host a lunch in honour of the visiting prime minister.

This will be followed by delegation-level talks and the signing of agreements.

During Modi’s visit, ties between India and Saudi Arabia are expected to be further elevated from the current strategic partnership to a more broad-based one.

Modi will leave for India late Sunday afternoon.

During the course of his three-nation tour, he attended the 13th India-European Union (EU) Summit in Brussels, held a bilateral meeting with Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel and took part in the Fourth Nuclear Security Summit hosted by US President Barack Obama in Washington.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of or any employee thereof. is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here