New Delhi: Shastri’s family for probe into late PM’s death, documents’ release

New Delhi (IANS): Late prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri’s son Anil Shastri on Saturday said his father’s death in Tashkent in 1966 – soon after signing a peace pact with Pakistan – could have been “unnatural” and demanded all government documents on the matter be made public.

Lal-bahadur-shastri - Copy

Anil’s younger brother Sunil Shastri also demanded an enquiry.

“The moment my mother (Shastri’s wife Lalita Devi) saw the body (after it was brought back to Delhi), she knew it was not a natural death. She told us it was a murder, there was out and out foul play,” Anil Shastri told news channel CNN-IBN.

However, Anil Shastri told IANS that he did not think his father was poisoned. “I don’t think he was poisoned. There is some doubt about his death that keeps surfacing every now and then in the past five decades,” he said.

Clarifying his statement made during his TV interview, he said: “I have said it could have been an unnatural death or even natural death. I don’t have any evidence to say anything specifically.”

He, however, reiterated his demand for a thorough probe into his father’s death.

“These doubts have been voiced not by the family, but even by other people from time to time. For putting to rest all the speculations about the death of the prime minister, soon after the signing of Tashkent agreement, the NDA government should declassify all the documents relating to Shastriji’s death,” Anil Shastri told IANS.

In his interview to CNN-IBN, Shastri, a Congress leader, urged the prime minister to release the documents and said it would not be “a bad idea to have an inquiry into his death, question all remaining witnesses and clear all speculation and at least establish the negligence”.

Shastri and Pakistani president, Field Marshal Ayub Khan, had been invited to Tashkent by then Soviet premier, Alexei Kosygin, for peace talks following the Indian-Pakistan War in 1965. An agreement was signed on January 10, 1966, but Shastri was found dead a few hours later.

His family indicated that marks and spots seen on his body were signs of foul play.
Recalling the scene, Anil Shastri said: “When his body came to the Palam airport, we found that the body had turned blue and there were white spots on his temple.”

He termed it “unbelievable” that the prime minister’s room in the capital of then Soviet Uzbekistan had “no call bell, no telephone, no caretaker in his room and no first aid. He had to walk up to the door himself” and alleged that the death was due to the Indian embassy’s fault, and it was the “height of negligence”.

“His death was badly handled by the Indian government. It hurts me to a great extent,” he said.

Opining that Shastri’s death was not taken “seriously”, he said: “Post-mortem could have been done in Tashkent if there was a request from the Indian government or a request from the Indian doctors.”

“… some close associates feel that suspicion revolves around an Indian hand or a foreign power,” he said.

Anil Shastri claimed that his father had come to know about a scam involving a shipping tycoon Dharam Teja, and citing an article by eminent journalist Khushwant Singh, claimed Teja was in Tashkent at the time of his father’s death.

He also claimed that his father was likely to take action and order an inquiry against Teja after his return to India.

Anil Shastri also raised the sudden death of Dr.R.N. Chugh, the personal physician accompanying the prime minister. Chugh had later died in an accident with his family.
He also added that his father’s personal assistant too met with an accident, was crippled and lost his memory.

Sunil Shatri, who is a Bharatiya Janata Party leader, told IANS that he had written to three prime ministers – Chandra Shekhar, I.K. Gujral and Manmohan Singh – requesting them to initiate an inquiry over his father’s death but too no avail.

“Chandra Shekhar and Gujral has replied that they will look over the matter, but nothing has been done till now,” he said.

Shastri’s grandson Siddharth Nath Singh told IANS that it was a long-pending demand of the family, the history, when written, on Shashtri “should speak the truth”.


  1. ”Congress chela Anil Shastri never raised this issue with UPA government. All of a sudden he woke up from sleep after 50 years gap. it is too early he can ask his grand son to raise this issue another 50 years later.”

    There is enough circumstantial evidence to say that one particulate a dynasty is behind the death of Shastri and disappearance of Netaji. Unfortunately there was no autopsy report on Shastriji.

  2. Shastri ji was a very well respected leader. His sudden death had come as a great shock for all the Indians. I don’t know if he had regular check ups which is a common practice for a PM. It is interesting to note that Indiraji’s government did not initiate any inquiry. It happened in Russia which was our alley those days. Is politics above truth? Shastri’s family wants to know. Watch Times Now.

    • Mr. Drona,

      Mr. Lal Bahadur Shastri was a very decent, honest and non-corrupt individual, a rarity when we talk about Indian politicians.

      Sadly, he has not been accorded a place in history. The only people who have been accorded place in history are members of the Dynasty, some functionaries of communal organizations, Amitabh Bachchan and Sharukh Khan, Sachin Tendulkar, et al. Now, they are speaking highly of Sania Mirza, who having been a perpetual failure in singles, being knocked out in second, third or fourth rounds, stopped playing singles and started playing doubles and to her luck she has got Martina Hingis, who was a celebrity player in singles in her salad days. Sania Mirza, a lady with an attitude, has an exaggerated importance of herself.

      As far as I am concerned, Pakistan is a terrorist state or a state spawning and sponsoring terrorism and she has proved her patriotism by marrying a Pakistani cricketer, as if this world is devoid of men. She appears to be proud, has an attitude problem and talks in an aped western accent.

      After all this and all the country did for Sania Mirza, when she started playing for India, the Government of India has turned a Nelson’s eye and allowed her to play for India. In fact, by marrying a Pakistani her loyalties are suspect and divided. Any day, Saina Nehwal is a better person than her and I have regards for her.

      I still recall a Corporate or some body had roped in Sania Mirza in 2005 or 2006, when she was still a teenager, to speak on using contraceptives for safe sex. This must have been the height of joke.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of or any employee thereof. is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here