Role of doctors, lawyers in CIA tortures condemned

Washington, June 12 (IANS/EFE) Doctors, psychologists and lawyers played a key role in rationalising torture methods practised in clandestine CIA detention centres, according to an article published in the US-based New England Journal of Medicine.

The publication based its article on data from a report last year by the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that revealed CIA tortures during the presidency of George W. Bush.

“The report adds to our knowledge of how lawyers and physicians can collaborate with each other to rationalise torture — a dynamic that has also played out in military prisons, including Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, and even in some US prisons, especially supermax prisons and others that rely heavily on solitary confinement,” doctors George Annas and Sondra Crosby wrote in their article.

Physicians got involved to determine whether the terrorists were “medically fit for torture” to avoid deaths and finally to oversee the healing of the prisoners.

According to the journal, the physicians were also involved in devising new torture methods.

The article says the CIA and Justice Department lawyers assured doctors of immunity under a legal cover tailored to cover these practices.

“Physicians and lawyers consistently gave themselves permission to do whatever they agreed among themselves,” the contribution said.

One of the torture methods was rectal feeding conducted on prisoners who were on hunger strike, to demonstrate dominance over the inmate.

Following the publication of the Senate report, Bush’s vice president, Dick Cheney, had argued that rectal feeding was “done for medical reasons”.

However, the journal points out that “there is, of course, no medical indication for rectal feeding”, and emphasises that “the fact that it was done by or under the supervision of a physician cannot convert this torture technique into a medical procedure”.

“Beyond the elimination of black sites, attorneys will have to stand with physicians who want to maintain their ethics (and follow, among other legal standards, the Geneva Conventions), support health professionals in their refusal to torture and refuse to give CIA agents and contractors prospective legal immunity for violating human rights laws,” says the report.

“And in all contexts, physicians should act only in ways consistent with good and accepted medical practice, with the consent of their patients,” concludes the article.

Crosby led the Boston Center for Refugee Health and Human Rights and Annas teaches bioethics at Boston University.

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of or any employee thereof. is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here