Singapore turned new Asian century dream into reality: Sushma

New Delhi, April 12 (IANS) It was under the able leadership of the city-state of Singapore in southeast Asia that the dream of a new Asian century turned into a reality, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj said on Tuesday.

“It was in Singapore, under the towering figure of Lee Kwan Yew, that the dream of a new Asian century first became a reality,” she said in her keynote address while launching the book “George Yeo on Bonsai, Banyan and the Tao”, a collection of 91 speeches and essays of the former foreign minister of Singapore and current chancellor of the revived Nalanda University.

“The transformation of Singapore from an impoverished colonial port to the ‘red dot’ that today emblazons the East is proof of what sustained and incorruptible commitment to development can achieve,” Sushma Swaraj said.

Stating that nations, both in the east and the west, looked to Singapore for inspiration and emulation, Sushma Swaraj said it has “created a nation of splendid diversity, while keeping the aspirations of the individual citizen’s growth at the centre of its aspirations”.

She also described Yeo as a philosopher-statesman of our times.

“The notion of a philosopher-statesman is not an idea that one hears too often these days, but perhaps it is appropriate that it is Singapore, like the ancient city states of Greece, that has produced one for our times,” Sushma Swaraj said.

She said Yeo combined the discipline and depth of the scholar with the practicality of an administrator and the strategic vision of a statesman.

“I have no doubt that his book will be an invaluable resource, not only for those who seek to understand the success of Singapore, but to all those who are invested in the rise of Asia, the defining dynamic of our age,” the external affairs minister said.

She said that in the Eastern imagination, Yeo’s characterisations of the environment and its nurture through the banyan and the bonsai have a profound resonance.

“At its core, they highlight our deep and abiding connection to nature that we regard as sacred,” Sushma Swaraj said.

“But they also highlight the bonds within our communities, and the linkages beyond. I cannot but agree with his metaphor of civilisation as a garden that needs to be continually tended.”

She also spoke of the idea behind the restoration of Nalanda Univerisity.

“Indeed, when India first suggested the restoration of Nalanda University, it was the thought of the revival of an ancient centre of learning that would bring together scholars and civilizations that animated its beginnings; where, to modify, the beautiful phrase of Mr. Yeo’s friend Wang Gungwu, the mandalas of the past and the future would overlap,” she stated.

“We are honoured that a scholar-statesman from the East now leads this institution.”

Former union home and finance minister P. Chidambaram described Yeo as a sharp debator who defended the Singapore model to the world.

“George is a true friend of India and a great admirer of China,” Chidambaram, who also happens to be a good friend of Yeo, said.

On his part, Yeo said there was something in India that attracted him and family to this great nation all too much.

“Its culture, its people, its big heart,” he said.

Also among the panelists were Singapore’s High Commissioner to India Lim Thuan Kuan, former vice-chairman of the Planning Commission N.K. Singh and Trinamool Congress member of parliament Sugata Bose.


  1. Quite honestly, with rare exceptions like Shree Modiji, none of those other Indian politicians are even qualified to utter the name ‘Lee Kwan Yew’. He was a true legend. His life, philosophy and style of governance will be studied for centuries to come!! He was ruthlessly nationalist, pragmatic and honest. He understood world politics better than anyone else. Did everything for his country and people. Even in his final years, he kept reminding young singaporeans the importance of good governance, international threats and pragmatic approach in life. Read his views on China, Doddanna, democracy, capitalism and more interestingly religion of peace!! smiles…

  2. “Quite honestly, with RARE exceptions like Shreeeee Modi’ji, none of those other Indian politicians are even qualified to utter the name ‘Lee Kwan yew'” – Namma rampe

    Ayyo…. our 56″ ‘waistman’ heads a nation where 100’s of millions have a collective IQ of < 100"!

    Is the poor man doing his 'job' with that fraction(th) of individual IQ? Work out the math, will you? Come on, ya, Rampa. A blue blood chaddi cant insult his ParamaSevaka like THAT? 😉

  3. Lee Kuan Yew is a great leader and there is no Indian Prime Minister of India who can be even remotely compared with him. However, amongst the Indian Prime Ministers, I have regards for P.V. Narasimha Rao, who opened up India’s Licence Raj, imports starved, socialist or communist type economy.

    Before elections and after he became Prime Minister, Narendra Modi has only made big promises which he has not been able to keep. He is merely a braggart and a stooge of R.S.S. which is an idealogical mentor for B.J.P. Party. When it comes to the wrong-doings of his partymen, he does not want to assert himself and get a good name and gratitude from the countrymen. For him, the party’s image and unity is of paramount importance.

    I am not able to understand why Padma awards were bestowed on swamis. Under B.J.P. sanyasis,, sanyasins, Baba Ramdev, etc. are having a field day.

  4. Joker Pinto probably thinks that Lee Kwan Yew is the one he met at a local Chinese restaurant – Hao Ming!! How does ‘Beef Club’ produce so many geniuses?

    • “Joker Pinto probably thinks that Lee Kwan Yew is the one he met at a local Chinese restaurant – Hao Ming” – Murudeshwara Joker Rampai

      Hahahaha! Actually, if you were to have popped that Q to our Pradhana Sevaka sometime before May 2014, he would have probably answered in the way you imagined! Just that the name of the restaurant would differ. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!

The opinions, views, and thoughts expressed by the readers and those providing comments are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of or any employee thereof. is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the readers. Responsibility for the content of comments belongs to the commenter alone.  

We request the readers to refrain from posting defamatory, inflammatory comments and not indulge in personal attacks. However, it is obligatory on the part of to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments to the concerned authorities upon their request.

Hence we request all our readers to help us to delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by informing us at Lets work together to keep the comments clean and worthful, thereby make a difference in the community.

Please enter your name here