Hope IOA will increase quota for CWG squad: Delhi HC on Tejaswin Shankar’s plea
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday expressed hope that the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) would consider the inclusion of high jumper Tejaswin Shankar and four other athletes in the national squad for the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games by increasing the quota of the squad.
“This court is hopeful that the IOA would increase the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) quota for participation in the Commonwealth Games so that all five additionally selected athletes (including Shankar) are included in the Commonwealth contingent,” said Justice Jasmeet Singh slating the matter for further hearing on July 4.
The court’s observation was following the submission of the Athletics Federation of India (AFI), in which it was informed that Shankar can be included in the squad if the AFI quota is increased by IOA.
Shankar, India’s high jump national record holder, was knocking the doors of the Delhi High Court following his exclusion from the 2022 Commonwealth Games squad. He was not included in the list of 37 names picked by the federation that held a selection committee meeting last week.
In the last hearing, the court had recorded that Shankar is the major contender for this year and only two people above him have the better jumps in the world. He met the qualification marks set by the AFI itself. The federation has been actively told to consider his participation in the selection meet, the court had noted.
The Delhi-based Shankar is studying business administration at Kansas State University in the United States and is on a four-year athletics scholarship since 2017.
In the plea, the petitioner contended that the AFI’s decision to exclude him from the CWG squad is arbitrary, illegal, and against national interest.
The decision of the federation is despite being the national high jump record holder (2.29m) and being the only Indian to have met the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) qualification standard of 2.27m with a jump of 2.27m as recently as June 10, while winning a gold medal at the NCAA Track and Field Outdoor Championship 2022 in Eugene, Oregon in the US, his plea said.
The petitioner made a representation to Radhakrishnan Nair, National Chief Coach as early as in February 2022 seeking an exemption from participation in the Interstate championships as they clashed with the NCAA Championship via WhatsApp. However, no response was provided by the AFI to the Petitioner’s request for an exemption, it stated.
In fact, Radhakrishnan had on June 11 intimated the petitioner via WhatsApp that he would be considered by the Selection Committee based on his 2.27m jump at the NCAA Track and Field Outdoor Championship 2022, and repeatedly enquired about the status of the Petitioner’s visa for the CWG 2022, it added.
The plea further said that the “AFI Qualification Guidelines For Selection Of Indian Team” provides the AFI the discretion to exempt “elite” athletes from participating in the Interstate Championships. The guidelines themselves do not speak of the need for a representation for exemption to be made and it becomes clear that the AFI could exempt an elite athlete if deemed appropriate.”
The AFI granted exemptions to Neeraj Chopra, Seema Punia and Avinash Sable from the said event. In fact, Ms Punia was included in the squad despite not having met the qualification standard in any competition this season (she has a best this season of 55.97m as against the qualification standard of 58m). Despite this, Ms Punia has been allowed in the team provided she secures the qualification standard at California,” read the writ petition.
The plea also referred the case of Manika Batra v. Table Tennis Federation of India, 2021, saying the court accepted the submission of the Additional Solicitor General that the National Sports Code, 2011 enjoins all national sports federations to make a judicious selection of players for participation in major international events based on merit and not merely on the basis of attending National Camps organised by them.
It was also submitted that there is nothing in the Sports Code, 2011 that mandates sports bodies to frame such rules for individual-based sports where the comfort, convenience, and preference of the individual player is paramount.