Muslim Girls stage Protest Against ABVP on Burkha Issue

Muslim Girls stage Protest Against ABVP on Burkha Issue

Shivamogga: Muslim students staged a protest against atrocities on Muslim girls in front of the DC office here on February 4.

Addressing the protesters Shabana said, “From the past two days ABVP members are opposing Muslim girls from entering the campus wearing the Burkha. The students who come wearing the Burkha have been harassed and physically assaulted. We the Muslim girls do not have protection in the college. We need safety while pursuing our education. Two days ago the Kuvempu University has clarified that there is no dress code for students, but the ABVP are creating problems for the Muslim girl students”, she said.

The protesters allege that youth from outside come to the campus and create problems and some of the lecturers support these goons. They shouted slogans against the ABVP members and demanded their arrest. Students also demanded safety and security for the Muslim girl students in the campus and to take action against those involved in creating violence.

Later a memorandum was submitted to the Deputy commissioner by the students.

9 Comments

  1. Education and campus across India is in self destruction mode thanks to former Education minister Smriti Irani.
    Witch hunt that started with death of Dalit student Rohit Verrumal is continued in JNU campus using Delhi police and doctored video by Zee TV. Once aspiring for scientist by Verumals brother is now livelihood depend on Rickshaw running.

    RSS student wing is taking the orders from Nagpur is now implementing Hitler’s education policy. PM Modi wanted ‘Selfie with daughter’ and Beti bahu bachao mahapanchayat for vote bank. ABVP wanted to disrobe the daughters of India by forcefully removing ‘Burqa’.

    For centuries Indian culture from nudism on temple wall to ‘Ghoonghat’ before their elders lived in unison.
    Is sangh Parivar wanted ‘nudism’ in campus? Why are they maintain silence on issue like dowry,female feticide, prostitution, inequality etc? Why they didn’t protest when PM Modi information ministry revoke ‘porn’ ban? Where is the student wing when BJP MLA’s in Karnataka, Gujarat,Orissa caught watching porn in the assembly?

    Jai Hind

  2. As the western societies are finally waking up to ban this medieval dress code, the cowards in Indian media and politics are totally silent and hiding under desks. It takes moral courage to stand up to some of these atrocities and fight for a better, civilized society. Our pseudo-secular groups and media are an embarrassment and entirely responsible for pushing muslim women to this sad state where they are forced to justify their own abuse!! Unbelievable!! I don’t support any aggressive moves from ABVP. But, before anyone starts lecturing Hindus on tolerance, watch this latest report from Canada and how christian groups are fighting back!!!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9NdN4a6D_g

  3. good job girls…always stand up for your right….these unwanted criminals of the society want to disturb peaceful atmosphere of Mangalore by one or the other reason…they want girls to be in short skirt, jeans with short t shirts so that they can enjoy and get a reason to tease girls….don’t worry girls, you are able to fight these uncultured goondas of the society…shame on them…

  4. It is woman’s prerogative to wear whatever they like according to the prevailing culture and tradition. However, one must understand that covering face is like covering identity. For safety reasons, covering one’s identity should not be allowed considering what is going on in today’s world.

  5. Education institutions are platform to build students future. But RSS student wing ABVP creating a sense of insecurity and chaos across reputed institution by creating friction among the students who are future of this nation.
    For ages Indian government had given constitutional rights of Sikh community to enjoyed the religious significance to wear ‘Dastar'(turban). With religious obedience turban wearing Sikhs served the nation without hindering block. Recently U.S. service men and women who wish to wear a turban, beard or hijab for religious reasons will be able to gain approval thanks to revised uniform regulations that aim to better accommodate religious minorities serving in the military. Sikhs in the UK have won the right to wear their turbans to work.The first Sikh guardsman has given permission to wear a turban instead of a bearskin while on duty outside Buckingham Palace.

    When H1N! virus broke out 3/4 os the planet is willingly adopted to the new fasion to cover their faces. Airport authority is customary to this practice without any security concern.

    For centuries ‘nudism’ in the form of art decorated on the walls of ancient temples and ‘Ghoonghat’ dignity of the women coexisted without any friction.

    PM of the nation wanted ‘Selfie with daughter’. ABVP wanted to disrobe the dignity of daughters of India.
    Nudism is acceptable in the ancient art. But objectionable in modern art. Skirts,minis,micro,tight lycra is acceptable, but covering face is objectionable. They have no objection for the ‘porn’ ban revoked by the government and explicit video watching in assembly.

    In a nation every 10 minutes one woman gets abused.
    NCRB crime report: Over 34,600 rape cases in India; Delhi tops among UTs
    http://www.newsnation.in/article/144464-ncrb-crime-report-over-34600-rape-cases-in-india-delhi-tops-among-uts.html
    BJP ruled Madhya Pradesh has reported 4,391 rape cases, a highest among the states.

    These ABVP student should come out of stereotype and must use their energy to strive hard to eliminate prostitution, female infanticide, dowry, pay inequality, women abuse.The campus invasion for the political benefits to divide the nation should be stopped.This ugly campus politics is disaster awaiting for the nation.

    Those who seeking knowledge ‘Burqa’ should not be obstacle.

    Jai Hind

  6. Sikhs wear Turbans, Catholic nuns were the Habit and many peoples around the world have their dress codes and in most democracies ALL these people have been accepted and they can wear their dress codes. While in the West and some countries around the world there has been a call to ban Burqa only. This begs the most logical question, why on the burkha?

    There are 2 reasons why the Burqa has come under the spot light.

    1. Unlike other religions, Islam has a well defined law known as Sharia. In Sharia a woman MUST wear cover her hair, and with different schools of Sunni & Shia Islam there are variances and difference based on the schools of thought and their jurisprudence on the woman’s attire, and how much of the woman should covered up to be Sharia compliant.

    The brings us to what is Sharia? Sharia come from the root word “Shara” in English language which roughly translated means “The Way”. There are many volumes and statutes of Sharia, and when you go through all of them and fully understand Sharia, you will see that it is diagonally opposite democracy, and so both cannot and will never survive side by side. In the last decades Muslims in the West are actively working to overthrow Democracy, and replace it with Sharia. There are about 57 countries in the world were Muslims are in a majority, but none are FULLY democratic. The may do have sham elections and kangaroo courts, but bulk of their laws are taken from Sharia.

    2. There is a need to identify people by law enforcement agencies, vigilantes, CCTV’s are in many places just to identify people but when people cover up and one has no clue who is under that covering. It could a man masquerading as a woman, it could be a criminal running from the law or it could be anything.

  7. Does the Constitution or Sharia take precedence? The same issue is provoking controversy in the US although the press does not articulate the cause of the disquiet. Srdja Trifkovic of Chronicles Magazine analyzes Trump’s executive order and explains the purpose of the the executive order.

    n order to protect Americans, the United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles. The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.

    The Executive Order was carefully crafted: for a Muslim to declare that he accepts the Constitution of the United States as the source of his highest loyalty is an act of apostasy par excellence; and apostasy is punishable by death under the Islamic law. The Sharia, to a Muslim, is not an addition to the Constitution and laws of the United States, with which it coexists; it is the only true code, the only basis of obligation. To be legitimate, all political power must rest exclusively with those who enjoy Allah’s authority on the basis of his revealed will, and America is therefore illegitimate ab initio.

    Section 1 effectively demands that a Muslim gives up this key tenet of his faith in order to be eligible for admission. Its drafters knew that a foreigner who becomes naturalized has to declare, on oath, “that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

    It is sacrilegious for a Muslim to swear to this, since it means that he would be prepared to shoot a fellow Muslim, or denounce him to the authorities, in defense of his adopted homeland. A devout Muslim can become an American citizen only if in taking the oath he is practicing taqiyya, the art of dissimulation that was inaugurated by Muhammad to help destabilize and undermine non-Muslim communities. “

  8. People who don’t have no basic knowledge of Indian constitution are know preaching the ‘holy book’.

    The provisions relating to “Right of Freedom of Religion” of the Articles 25 & 28 of the Constitution of India make India a secular state. To make assurance doubly sure, the 42nd amendment of the constitution inserts the term “secular” in the preamble of the constitution.

    Hence on the question of religion, India’s position is:

    India has no state religion,
    State does not discriminate between religions,
    State cannot impose any tax to promote a religion or to maintain religious institution,
    Religious instructions cannot be imparted in educational institution run by state funds and
    In educational institutions recognized by the state and receiving aid from the government, religious instructions cannot be compulsorily given to an unwilling students. In educational institutions run by religious establishments, religious instructions can be given only to students willing to receive it. Religious instructions can be given to the minors only with the express consent of their guardians.

    Some people religious obedience to cover her body became security threat. Many nation are now witnessing severe winter country in the world. People cover themselves from head to toe round the clock have no security issue. Modern technology has gone so far that one can easily kept under surveillance. Most developed nation like US gun lobby kills more citizens than terror attacks.Whenever they identity of the person not belongs to minority community media identifies them as ‘lone wolf’, ‘supremacist’ , lone gunman’. But they are never addressed as terrorist.

    Now people have over writing the meaning from the book of Almighty God. Even some stoop to low blaming the Prophets of Islam ignoring the fact and adventures wars that left trail of destruction.

    Burqa is unnecessarily dragged into controversy by the people who glorify ‘nudism’. Perception of threat can come in many ways but only ‘Burqa’ is being subjected to additional threat. In western imperialism when there are no cloaks rapes and abuse against women are highest. People don’t believe in fact and figures always reserve their energy to discriminate other religion.

  9. “In western imperialism when there are no cloaks rapes and abuse against women are highest”… Sweden has the highest number of rape victims and India is # 4 in the world. By the way who are the rapist? Those, living on the fat of the land with everything FREE, they are the ones raping woman. It has become an epidemic with blond European woman are now colouring their hair black to avoid being sexually harassed.

    Why only woman should wear a Burqa? Why should woman be allowed to see men? If by seeing a person from the opposite sex one gets worked up, then both men and woman MUST wear Burqa. When woman wear black Burqa, Men should wear White Burqa, that would be perfect.

Comments are closed.